Why it works
It starts from a play your team has already run on your own data. The metric and the comparison accounts are agreed in writing in week one, and we build with the people who use it.
Implementation · 12 weeks · From $5K a month
Your team has run the play. In 12 weeks it runs on every account.
We build what production needs on one agreed metric, hand it to your team, and measure the lift.
Book a call30 min · no prep needed
What you walk away with
01
The play on every account it's meant for
Running inside your CRM, sequencer, dialer and Slack, with approvals in place and every agent action logged.
02
A number attached to it
The play read against comparison accounts over the same weeks, set beside the prediction we wrote down before launch.
03
A team that can run it
Code, runbooks and training, so you don't depend on us to keep it going.
How sure, how soon, and what it asks of you
How fast
Working versions in days and a release every week. The read runs weekly, and the full read lands in week 12.
What it takes from you
An owner for the metric, the people who'll use the play in weekly sessions, and write access added one workflow at a time. We do the building.
The price
From $5K a month, scoped in writing after the bootcamp, before we build. The bootcamp's $5,000 is credited toward it. Data and model costs we run for you are billed at cost.
How the 12 weeks run
- Step 011
Connect your data
Weeks 1 and 2. Extend the data the play reads to every account it will touch. Write access is added one workflow at a time, only where the play needs it.
- Step 022
Prioritize by revenue impact
Weeks 1 and 2. Write the scope: the metric, the target, the comparison accounts, and what's in and out. That's the number the sprint answers to.
- Step 033
Ship into the tools your team uses
Weeks 3 to 10. A release every week into your CRM, sequencer, dialer, Slack and AI workspace, shown to the people who use it and rebuilt with them.
- Step 044
Keep improving
Weeks 11 and 12. Launch with the team, read the play against the comparison accounts, hand over the docs and code, and name the next costliest decision.
What we build in the sprint
Only what the play needs in production, drawn from these four.
Agents
Agents taken from first version to every eligible account, with people approving buyer-facing work at the level its reach calls for.
Read moreAutomated workflows
Steps automated only after the play proved them by hand.
Read moreCustom apps and MCPs
Review screens where approving the work is faster than doing it, and connectors for the tools that won't integrate.
Read moreAgentic tool implementation
Coding agents set up your CRM, sequencer and dialer for the play, and your admin approves each change.
Read moreLength, price and terms
| Length | Price | What you own |
|---|---|---|
| 12 weeks | From $5K a month | Data, code, skills, prompts and the repo, yours wherever they run |
Not the right fit if
- Your team hasn't run the play yet. Start with the bootcamp: 4 weeks, $5,000 for the first five teams, then $10,000, credited toward Implementation if you continue. - Nobody owns the metric the sprint answers to. - You want tools built with no number attached. A contractor will cost you less.
After the sprint
Next comes the AI operating partnership, where we work with your team on the next plays against the number. Or your team runs what we built from the runbooks. Every package follows our process.
Before you book
Why 12 weeks?
Long enough to build something real, and short enough to show up at your next board meeting or the one after.
Our GTM engineers could build the production version. Why bring you in?
They could, and they'll own it after. We add the comparison read leadership will accept and the call on what to cut, and we pair with them on the hard parts. What we add for in-house builders.
What if the scope changes?
We re-scope in writing. No surprise invoices.
What if it doesn't move the number?
We read it against the comparison accounts every week, so we know early and change the build inside the scope while there's time left.
What changes for buyers at full volume?
A named person approves what a buyer sees. One to few: one approval per cluster, plus a spot check of rendered drafts. One to many: the argument once, checks on every row, and failures wait for a person. An executive's voice, tier-1 first touches, new claims and spend: always one by one.
Where's your line stuck?
Take your bootcamp play to production
Bring the bootcamp readout and the number you answer for. In 30 minutes we'll scope the sprint.
Book a call